What takes more skill? Halo 3 or Call of Duty 4?

[Christian A]

Me and my friend are having a debate on whether Halo 3 or Call of Duty 4 takes more skill. The main argument for Halo 3 is less auto-aim, you cant rush without being seen on the motion tracker, and cover is actually useful. The main argument for Call of Duty 4 is that you can be killed quickly, your weapons are more inaccurate, and there is more stealth in that game. Please dont just choose a side but give reasons why. Thank you.

 

[thebard17182]

it is about the same there is no diffenert in guns or what have you nor do i care to hear your reasons to i am wrong. your probably a noob

 

[Nannette J]

Halo 3 is more fun



Call of Duty 4 Takes More Skill

 

[Woj]

Halo 3.

Call Of Duty 4 is just point and shoot. In Halo, you need to use tactics to get your enemy's shield down and then kill them instead of just shooting some enemy once and killing them.

 

[baseball2k27]

Here are my arguments

Halo3- More of a tactics game with the vehicles and game types. It also is a spray and pray game and whoever has a bigger gun wins. The case is also the fact that many people just double or triple team and the fact you die slower then cod 4.

Cod4- Anyone can get a kill, but it doesnt depend on your gun, i can take out a p90 user with a pistol or scorpion. It doesnt have much tactic if you dont have a team with you or are playing search and destroy. Its more of a spray and pray game then halo where if your playing hardcore you just fire alot for a kill. Many people think this takes more skill but im siding with halo 3. I am a devout fan of both and i like cod 4 but halo 3 seems like i have more strategy and takes more skill